Sunday, April 16, 2006

New Life on Easter

It's Easter evening at 9 pm, and I am sitting on the Labor and Delivery Unit, awaiting the imminent delivery of a preterm infant. The mother is at 34 1/2 wks gestation (5 1/2 wks early), and has dilated to 7 centimenters, so it could be any time that she delivers. Or it could be all night until it happens. Or a few weeks. You never can tell.

She is far enough along in her pregnancy that we are not doing any aggressive interventions to try and stop her delivery, though we are not attempting to hurry things along either. 34-35 wks is a gray area. Prior to 34 wks, we would aggressively give her "tocolytics"--medicines to break her contractions--and give the mother steroids, which hasten fetal lung maturity. But at 34 wks, steroids are ineffective, and so little is gained by attempting to stop her contractions. (And anyways, most drugs that we use to stop contractions, when studied, are competely ineffective in preventing preterm delivery by more than a day or two.) By 36 wks, you can almost guarantee lung maturity in the absence of diabetes. But here we sit, in between, at 34 1/2 wks, expectantly managing her preterm labor, hoping that she may hold off for a few more days, but ready to deliver her in the next few hours.

Interestingly, Elizabeth and I had a relevent discussion last night, related to obstetrics and preterm birth and our religious convictions: when does the spirit enter the body of a newborn?

You would think that, having delivered somewhere around 250 babies, this would be something that I have frequently pondered. But actually no. With modern technology allowing us to look at life within the womb from early in pregnancy and throughout labor, some of the surprise--but not the wonder--seems to have vanished. A baby's emergence from the birth canal and its first "breath of life" has become just the next step of a journey, not a de novo incarnation of a previously soul-less organism. So last night's discussion challenged my beliefs.

The beauty of birth will always be there for me; the mother's final scream and the baby's first cry still bring me near tears. (Elizabeth will attest that, by all accounts, I am incapable of actually shedding true tears.) But it's the literal sweat, blood and tears (and numerous other bodily fluids--birthing has a sweet stench all its own), the exhaustion and triumph of the moment, that grip my heart, not an awareness of a spirit descending into a previously uninhabited body.

I believe, for a variety of ethical and religious reasons, that "life" begins at conception, at the creation of a new set of chromosomes harbored in a cell that has the capacity to become a complete human being. This nascent life, though not yet viable, has the full capacity to become so, and thus should be given its ethical dues.

I also believe that each of us human beings exists as a duality of spirit and substance, our eternal intelligence animating our flesh and bones. The spirit dwelling within the body constitutes a living "soul," created in the image of God. Prior to inhabiting our bodies, our spirits dwelt in His presence, sent to Earth to gain a body and to be tested and tried. Birth is then both a forgetting and a launch; all of our memories of premortal life are withdrawn, shrouded by a thin veil that then impels us to exercise faith on our journey back towards God.

If that is the case, then at what point in time does a spirit leave God's presence and enter into the fetus or infant? The Bible recounts how John the Baptist, out of recognition of the Son of God, "leaped" in the womb when Elizabeth approached the pregnant Mary, suggesting a intrauterine presence of John's (and Christ's) spirit. But then the Book of Mormon details how Christ's voice spoke to Nephi on the night before his birth: "On the morrow come I into the world," suggesting that his Spirit had not yet come into the womb. Contradictions abound: we do not recognize miscarried or stillborn fetuses as "children" on official church records, whereas we do acknowledge the life of a baby that takes one breath and then dies. This discrepancy constitutues a major ontological distinction, but is it truly a significant physiological one?

Regardless of how we recognize or legitimatize a birth, what is acutally happening at the moment? When does a viable fetus receive an intelligent spirit and become a living soul? Obviously I don't have the answer, only a supposition: that the birth of a soul is a nine month process, a vessel slowly docking and anchoring at a port over time. Defying Newtonion physics, this would qualify as a sort of wave-particle duality: the spirit at at once drifting in a harbor and simultaneously tethered to a dock, drawn daily closer to permanent anchor. A preterm baby, then, might be drifting languidly into port, only to be pulled roughly and unexpectedly into dock through the last few yards of water.

Or so it seems to me. But while trying to wring sense from these metaphysical mysteries, reality interrupted, and we safely delivered the 34 weeker an hour and a half ago. She weighed in at a whopping--and surprising-- 6 lbs 8 oz, vigorous and screaming. Just to be safe, we'll keep her in the intensive care nursery overnight to make sure she transitions well. It seems likely she will.

So whether her little spirit has been dwelling in her body for nine months or just ninety minutes, she looks a little shellshocked right now. She's a fighter, though. Since she has so recently been one of the two key participants in this whole birthing process, maybe I should ask her for the real answers to my deep questions. She probably would impertinently look at me and say, "What does it matter? I'm here now, aren't I?"

Yes. Here and hungry. Welcome home, little one. For now at least, that's what this place will be.

Happy Easter!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"You have a talent for trivializing the profound and complicating the obvious"

That is paraphrase of one of the generals in "Gettysburg" addressing General George Pickett and I cite it only in jest. I like your blog and look forward to your future clarifications of life's mysteries.

Anonymous said...

"You have a talent for trivializing the profound and complicating the obvious"

That is a paraphrase one of the generals in "Gettysburg" addressing General George Pickett, and I use it here in jest only. I like your blog and look forward to your future explanations of life's mysteries.

Anonymous said...

Oops, I commented twice with the same thing because I thought I erased the first one on accident. Oh well, now you have three comments so you look popular.

Looks are everything anyway.

Anonymous said...

The question of when life begins is a mysterious one. Our baby, for instance, after 37 weeks of pregnancy, is already capable of life outside the womb and already has his own kind of personality inside it.

Your description of a spirit drifting in the harbor but tied to the dock makes sense to me, even though is doesn't make much scientific sense. "Time is measured only unto man..."

Abortion of a fetus capable of life is so obviously wrong that it doesn't even need to be argued. Abortion of a developing embryo, while still very wrong, seems a bit harder to define. But, I still remember the ultasound that we had at 11 weeks when we saw a baby with arms and legs who was kicking and moving like crazy, happy to be alive. It seems to me that the "breath of life" is not possible without the presence of one of God's spiritual creations.

On paper, life begins when a baby leaves the womb. In reality, life is not only eternal, but complicated enough that it defies definition by a two dimensional medium like paper and pencil. In my opionion, it would take a lot more than 3 or even 4 dimensions to fully capture a definition of "life."

The beautiful thing is that even though no matter how smart we think we might be, for now in mortality, we'll never really understand one of God's greatest mysteries, life, but that doesn't stop us from participating in the wonderful process that is also the sweetest gift of God to his children.

Anonymous said...

August 24, 2008

Catching Your Breath: New Life on Easter
The spirit dwelling within the body constitutes a living "soul," created in the ... then at what point in time does a spirit leave God's presence and enter ...
catchingyourbreath.blogspot.com/2006/04/new-life-on-easter.html - 78k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

August 24, 2008
Thank you for a beautifully written, thoughtful and thought provoking piece on when does the soul enter the body. I trust your daughter born on April 16, 2006 (Easter Sunday)is doing well, and is healthy.

In response to Senator Obama's answer to Pastor Rick Warren's question at the Saddleback forum on August 17, 2008, on this morning's MTP, Nancy Pelosi said to Tom Brokaw that St. Augustine had stated life begins at 3 months. As a Zoroastrian by birth, though more of an eclectic Christian by choice, I decided to google this response. After weeding through much verbal garbage, I came across a very succinct article that put both St. Augustine and St. Aquinas theology in the perspective of the known science of their time.

During the current debate regarding Amendment 2, some proponents have declared that the Church has changed her position on the beginning of human life. They cite the teaching of St. Augustine of Hippo and St. Thomas Aquinas, who taught that a new human life becomes present in the womb some 40 days after sexual intercourse. What Amendment 2 proponents fail to note is that St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas were following what the science of the time told them about the beginning of human life. In Aristotelian biology, which St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas were following, human conception was thought to take place through the mixing of the semen from the male with blood secreted within the female. It is important to note that ovulation had not yet been discovered. The mixing involved a process of gradual transformations from the vegetative state to the animal state to the rational state, at the conclusion of which the body was sufficiently organized to receive the human soul.

If St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas were alive today, they would accept the findings of contemporary embryology. Having the evidence from science that the 23 matched chromosomes — the complete genetic identity of a human being — are present from the moment of fertilization or at the moment of the artificial stimulation of the denucleated ovum, into which the body cell of a person to be cloned has been inserted, they would hold that from that moment, true to the natural law, human life must be safeguarded and fostered. In other words, they would hold to the consistent teaching of the Church that, once human life has begun, then it has inviolable dignity. To be clear, the Church's teaching has not changed, but science has developed to teach us more precisely when human life begins.

Source:

St. Louis Review Online
Oct 27, 2006 ... We depend upon science to tell us when human life begins. ... They cite the teaching of St. Augustine of Hippo and St. Thomas Aquinas, ...
www.stlouisreview.com/abpcolumn.php?abpid=11703 - 29k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

I further decided to google, "When does the soul enter the body?"

One web site had this interesting observation:

The major aspect of the consciousness, or the soul, enters at or near the first breath. However, part of the consciousness seems to be connected with the body from the moment of conception, receiving and recording all experience in the forming body including the thoughts and feelings of the mother. This information is unfiltered, unprocessed and accepted without judgment or discrimination. The impact of this information can have devastating effects on the mind and life of the person in childhood, adolescence and adulthood.

Source; http://www.spiritreleasement.org/birth_regression.htm


Next, I came across your blog, which I read with much interest.

In particular:

If that is the case, then at what point in time does a spirit leave God's presence and enter into the fetus or infant? The Bible recounts how John the Baptist, out of recognition of the Son of God, "leaped" in the womb when Elizabeth approached the pregnant Mary, suggesting a intrauterine presence of John's (and Christ's) spirit. But then the Book of Mormon details how Christ's voice spoke to Nephi on the night before his birth: "On the morrow come I into the world," suggesting that his Spirit had not yet come into the womb. Contradictions abound: we do not recognize miscarried or stillborn fetuses as "children" on official church records, whereas we do acknowledge the life of a baby that takes one breath and then dies. This discrepancy constitutues a major ontological distinction, but is it truly a significant physiological one?

Does this mean the church recognizes life ONLY after the first breath?

I have other questions I would like to pose to you, as a physician, and a thinker:

(1) Is a fertilized egg a life?
I would like you to consider one question. If a sperm and egg are conjoined in a petrie dish, that "fertilized egg" will never become a human being until and unless it is attached to the wall of the Mother's womb, and gets life giving blood and nourishment. So, life begins not at conception (fertilization), but at the point of implantation of the cell to the Mother's womb. Often nature, prevents a fertilized egg from implantation. This leads to the question: Is contraception to prevent to fertilized egg from implanting itself on the wall of the uterus, an acceptable form of contraception?

(2) Embryonic Stem Cell research: If a "fertilized egg" is not going to be implanted in a female womb, and is going to be discarded as medical waste. Is it not more ethical to use these embryonic stem cells (see argument in (1)) to advance medical benefits and save other lives?

(3) Since, God often allows for miscarriages / still born/ as a way of "natural selection", including preventing the birth of highly deformed zygotes. Is there any case to be made for an abortion in the first trimester of a highly deformed fetus? (In the sense, the zygote slipped from under the safety net of the "natural selection" process.) I realize a child with deformities can be a blessing, and teach the parents, siblings about the true meaning of life, and spiritual growth. Yet, often these children bring a lot of stress: break-up of families; other siblings not getting the time and attention they need, etc., etc.

I ask these questions, not because I pretend to know the answers, but because I would like to start a conversation.

Thank you,

Ayesha F. Nariman
Williamsville, NY
afnariman@gmail.com